Showing posts with label supply side economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label supply side economics. Show all posts

Nov 21, 2012

Another reason to run away from supply-side economics




Conservatives have been running on the economic theory that if the rich get richer, their extra money trickles-down to everyone else. But according to the exact opposite is true. The economy gets better when the poor get richer.

On Tuesday, Venture capitalist Nick Hanauer told Ezra Klein, on MSNBC’s ‘The Last Word,:

“This idea that if we just keep squeezing workers at the bottom, that somehow we’ll get more prosperous is obviously, categorically untrue. Look, if there was a truth to any of these arguments, given how rich  the rich have gotten for instance, given how profitable corporations have gotten in the last 10 years, we would be drowning in jobs and prosperity. It’s the opposite of true. The way you animate prosperity in a capitalistic economy is by raising the bottom and using the surpluses.”

A look at historical economic data shows that Hanauer is right on the money. At times when the income inequality gap shrinks, the country experiences an economic boom.
The concept of tying higher wages for workers to economic growth goes back to early in the last century, when automaker Henry Ford said his employees needed to make enough money to buy the products they made. By doing so, it expands to buying-power of consumers and expands the middle-class.

But what’s been happening in America over the past 30 years or so, is businesses have been blaming wages for reduced profits. In turn, they have cut workers’ pay, which gives them less money to put back into the economy. 

Hanauer calls it, “a death spiral of falling demand.” 

At some point, there are not enough people left with enough money to buy any of the products their bosses make. When demand stops, the top economic tier also comes tumbling down.

The theory of trickle-down economics is not only unsustainable, it’s a ticket to economic collapse.

For some reason, this rather obvious concept has been lost on American voters who continue to election conservatives who are destined to completely collapse the economy with supply-side theory. By implementing ever-more drastic policies that widen the gap between rich and poor, they erode the buying power of America’s economic engine which at some point, brings it to a complete halt.

If every person in America today could afford to live in a comfortable home, buy a new car every three years, send their kids to college, and retire with enough money to maintain their lifestyle, the US economy would be thriving and the federal deficit would be history.

America is letting vulture capitalism rule government policy, instead of the other way around, and everyone but the super-rich are suffering for it. However, their day will also come if they are allowed to squeeze the buying-power life out of their workers.
The best way to grow the economy and create jobs is to give the poor the opportunity to become the middle-class. 

With trickle-up economics, the more money everyone has to spend, the more money everyone makes. The logic is impeccable. But convincing the rich to part with their money for the good of the nation is as foreign in America today as the jobs CEO’s ship overseas in their quest for cheap labor. They are creating their own doomsday and don’t appear to be smart enough to know it.

 
Recommended:





Dec 10, 2010

GOP tax cut plan: Redistribution of wealth to the rich?

Bush tax cuts vs Obama tax cuts

Throughout the current recession, those hurt the least have been the super rich. They are also the primary beneficiaries of the GOP tax cut deal with President Obama.

If America had a budget surplus the tax package might not be facing opposition. However, with the balance sheet nearly $14 trillion on the red, the United States budget deficit is at the center of this debate.

The Bush tax cuts, as all tax code manipulation, are a form of redistribution of wealth. Whether the discounts go to the rich or poor does not change the mechanics. The portion of the Obama tax bill compromise that applies to the rich will cost taxpayers $420 billion. Since the wealthy will be paying less, (percentage-wise) it is essentially a subsidy from the middle class and poor into the pockets of the rich.

Consensus among democrats and the American public according to a recent CBS News poll, says on the republican tax cut deal is not what the electorate wants; it’s bad for the country, will not create jobs, and will add more to the deficit than it’s worth.
Republicans have been conspicuously silent on the simplest solution to the tax cut debate, which is to pass the bill without the portion that applies to the top tax brackets.

The GOP refusal to cooperate has been called a form of hostage taking by opponents to the bill, including President Obama. Political commentators have hotly debated the pros and cons of the legislation, but few have called the bill what it actually is; a redistribution of wealth that favors multi-millionaires.

MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell said, “Remember what supply-side economics is. It is the promise that by cutting taxes, the treasury is going to collect more revenue because the economy will be so wildly stimulated by cutting taxes...But by cutting these taxes the treasury is going to collect less money…”

Mr. O’Donnell’s remarks are probably the most honest, realistic words ever spoken about  tax cut policy.


Follow mrt7384 on Twitter